Everyday, tons of food are wasted from restaurants and stores all over the world
Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem?
The predicament of eaters discarding a high quantity of food has existed for years. This problem might be the consequence of the culinary world and bulk purchasing. Actions from the government and food companies can help mitigate this issue.
The possible causes for wasting food lie within the nature of food and drink industry. The first one derives from food service operators. Food loss is often the result of kitchen culture or staff behavior such as over-preparation or improper ingredient storage. All-you-can-eat buffets, for instance, are particularly wasteful since they are packed with assorted dishes but hardly consumed fully. After the eating hours, the food remnants cannot be reused or donated due to health code restrictions, which eventually causes a high level of wastes. Another justification is the promotion of mass buying. Various foods are displayed at discount prices, encouraging customers to choose in bulk. However, they do not probably eat all of what they buy, resulting in unfinished food thrown away once it reaches the expiry date.
This worrying matter could be effectively tackled by the joint action from the government and businesses. Firstly, restaurant ought to predict the amount of food stored and food used by establishing a tracking system which can be done either manually or technologically. Such a food tracking mechanism is proved to be efficient in strictly controlling food consumed, thus reducing the food waste level. Finally, legislators should require supermarkets and food facilities to exhibit posters concerning wise shopping and ordering; brochures about careful food choice need attaching to certain food items as well. This radical campaign would entail consumers having more responsibility in making food purchases.
In summary, the main culprits behind this issue are culinary habits and mass buying. Where possible, having a food tracking method and public campaigns would effectively alleviate the situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54635761589 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91455629437 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665562913907 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7816378213 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0555555556 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269082547796 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815180089378 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482203104206 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160283186544 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567768560381 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.