Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that a diet, which does our health good, is possible without eating meat. Therefore, everyone should switch to vegetarianism. In my opinion, I partly agree with this concept for some following reasons.
Let us begin with the advantages of becoming a vegetarian. First of all, meat consumption is not always as healthy as we have assumed. It can be explained that intaking meat is believed to associate with the likelihood of suffering from heart diseases, diabetes or even cancers. For instance, there is strong evidence that eating red or processed meat increases the risk of being diagnosed with bowel cancer, which is one of the most common cancers in Australia. In addition, the treatment of animals in factory farms is on suspicion of being cruel and inhumane. For example, in order to produce fatty liver, geese are forced to have a highly energy-intaking diet through a pipe that carries food into geese’s stomachs. Thus, these geese may suffer from obesity and have difficulties in breathing.
On the other hand, there are some arguments against vegetarianism. It is shown that meat has been the main ingredient in traditional meals of many countries for thousands of years. As a result, people have become accustomed to consuming meat so that it is challenging to rearrange their lifestyle. Besides, meat-eaters argue that vegetarians do not follow a balanced diet. Because meat is believed to be the most convenient way of getting protein, which is important for their dietary needs.
In conclusion, although there are some undeniable benefits of being a vegetarian, I do believe that the selection of whether people should follow vegetarianism or not depends on each individual's belief and willingness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rearranging'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: rearranging
...onsuming meat so that it is challenging to rearrange their lifestyle. Besides, meat-eaters a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ow vegetarianism or not depends on each individuals belief and willingness.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19217081851 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95054494624 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0921292088 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272041098405 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794356617379 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614599836814 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155316188526 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237255132211 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.