Excessive traffic has made cities unpleasant places to live and work in. For this reason, private cars should be completely banned from city centres
At the present time, congestion is becoming popular in several cities because of overwhelming vehicles that leads the city is not ideal precinct to live. Thereby, some governments consider to prohibit individual cars in urban areas. I am convinced that this law should be done because some reasons which are the polluted exhaust, traffic system as well as gaining benefits to citizens.
The most significant reason is pollution from car fumes, which is in danger to human’s health causing respiratory diseases such as asthma and bronchitis. Furthermore, smoke from car results in the warmer climate and destroying the ozone layer.
A second reason why I am in favor of cars being banned is that many cities were not designed for motor traffic. A good example of this is Ho Chi Minh, the central city in the south of Viet Nam, which has narrow streets and lack of parking lot. Hence, traffic jam usually occur at the rush hour and parking a car extremely difficult in this area.
Finally, people can save greatly money by taking advantage of public transports instead of private cars. In addition, people may be safer when they must not drive in some dangerous cases such as drinking alcohol and having phone calls.
On the other hand, the prohibition of private cars might be impossible in several underdeveloped countries that do not have a good public transports system. As a result, well-designed public transport should be done previous to forbid cars in the city.
By way of conclusion, with all the proofs prenominated, I am of the opinion that the forbiddance of private car ought to apply in city. Government may achieve enormous success in not only protect the environment but also keeping the health for citizen, which offer excellent prospects about an ideal-to-live precinct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider prohibiting'.
Suggestion: consider prohibiting
...inct to live. Thereby, some governments consider to prohibit individual cars in urban areas. I am co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06040268456 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75144867273 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8051495345 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293747504093 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908264454557 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627743513502 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130461040052 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720514846221 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.