Fast food is now universally available in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while other do not. What about your opinions on this?

Essay topics:

Fast food is now universally available in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while other do not. What about your opinions on this?

The issue of whether the prevalent of instant food is a benefit to the world or not had become a contentious issue. Despite the arguments of some people that fast food is convenient, it is my personal belief that junk food is deteriorating both human’s health and social life. Two principal reasons for this are as follow.

For a start, it is a well-known fact that fast food is not beneficial to our health. In order to make the food that has a longer expiry date, producers use to add some chemicals into the food to pursue a longer preserving period. These kinds of substances are somethings that can damage our health or our immune systems. For example, the microwave foods can keep for a long time because they are added various kinds of chemicals to keep them look fresh. Further, fast food is made by some unhealthy ways. French fried is a flawless example, it is cooked by a large amount of oil and absorbs the oil. it is definitely an unhealthy lifestyle that we should alert.

Moreover, a shorter eating time from fast food fashion could has some negative effects to people’s relationship. As instant food is in the ascendant, people’s eating habit is changing to fast and individual. this trend will worsen the relationship with friends or family since they seldom eat with others or even though they have meal with people, the time is not long enough for them to get closer.

By and large, I once again reaffirm my view that the popular of fast food is not a positive trend. Not only do it damage our body, but it also ruin our social connection.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ife. Two principal reasons for this are as follow. For a start, it is a well-known f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...hat has a longer expiry date, producers use to add some chemicals into the food to ...
^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...arge amount of oil and absorbs the oil. it is definitely an unhealthy lifestyle th...
^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ating time from fast food fashion could has some negative effects to people's ...
^^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...bit is changing to fast and individual. this trend will worsen the relationship with...
^^^^
Line 13, column 115, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'damages'?
Suggestion: damages
...is not a positive trend. Not only do it damage our body, but it also ruin our social c...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 144, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ruins'?
Suggestion: ruins
...only do it damage our body, but it also ruin our social connection.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68571428571 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61217469413 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0457516127 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191056584219 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645887426857 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048309341877 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121303731646 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242144004733 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.