Fast foods are bad. Do you agree?
While fast foods are increasingly popular, they continue to be rather controversial because the benefits are hard to quantify exactly. There are arguments on both sides of this very topical debate, and I will discuss them now.
On the one hand, opponents of fast foods point to several health problems. For example, They are rich in calories and make us obese, their stay causes diabetes, heart trouble and liver damage. We see this in the low nutrient that harms consumers, and in the damage to baby growth caused by chemical additive, food coloring and preservative. Furthermore, there is a negative impact on the environment as well. In this case, the junk food industry uses plastic for packaging, leading to the soil degradation.
On the other hand, supporters of junk foods say that time minimized outweigh the disadvantages. They highlight the easiness that consumers will acquire, in areas such as preparation and cooking. For example, boiled chicken in can need some heat to warm while fresh chicken takes more energy and complicated spatchcock. They also say that convenience cookery leads to safe time on rush hour and increase time to work. Teenager in particular enjoy eating fast food while studying, because they believe it can increase amusement. Finally, many people feel that a financial economize, so important today, is fostered by spending a little money for one meal.
In conclusion, my own feeling is that fast foods have more negative impact on almost all aspects of our life, as it lacks of nutrient. Thus, they should consume fresh food to keep healthy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08812260536 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68280775782 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639846743295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7445571378 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151802643905 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524041206426 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551118260928 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101546094 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260114685026 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.