It is a fact that the use of several languages are grown predominantly high over the past few decades. Rapid use of certain languages gave a way to deficiency of few languages is a question. In my perspective, it is considered as negative trend than positive trend.
First of all, language is a formal outfit that has many effects on its multiple use. Predominancy of certain languages helps in better communication facilities and provides better understanding between nations where, a common language is very necessary to deal catastrophic events. For instance, a person who appears in a hospital need to know the common language of the nearby people to explain regarding his situation if the doctor doesn't know the language. Moreover predominant languages help in civilization and contemporary development when it progress to globalization
Eventhough common languages have many positive trends, negative trends are always due it it's peculiarities. Loss of tradition and cultures due to extinct languages. There are many festivals which is celebrated in relation to their local languages. For example, Malayali manka is a cultural fest competition related to Malayalam language. If people are not willing to such type of language, there is no point in such type of celebrations.
In my opinion each individual language plays a seductive role to sustain a nation with its heritage.
To recapitulate, it is clear that negative trends are outweigh positive trend for the use of common language and extinction of specific language which leads to the job loss of many personals works in the are of language teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll, language is a formal outfit that has many effects on its multiple use. Predom...
^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter understanding between nations where, a common language is very necessary to d...
^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n regarding his situation if the doctor doesnt know the language. Moreover predominant...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...if the doctor doesnt know the language. Moreover predominant languages help in civilizat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'progresses'?
Suggestion: progresses
...on and contemporary development when it progress to globalization Eventhough common ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... progress to globalization Eventhough common languages have many positive tren...
^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...e, it is clear that negative trends are outweigh positive trend for the use of common la...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fic language which leads to the job loss of many personals works in the are of la...
^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he job loss of many personals works in the are of language teaching.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, for example, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27799227799 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1142293257 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563706563707 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4814743336 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210927735683 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765803439682 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07782115577 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129703244892 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086500906792 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.