Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?
Movies were manufactured by big organizations in the past, but nowadays, individuals have abilities and opportunities to create a motion picture. Although this tendency could have some drawbacks, I would argue that there are far more benefits.
On the one hand, this trend could have some negative influences. Since people are capable of making films, movies produced by large companies might not be paid attention like they used to be. This might lead to the verge of bankruptcy of some large companies due to lack of viewers and profits. If people do not make films, movies created by these companies would be profitable. Additionally, people might plagiarize ideas from films created by big corporations. Due to the miscellany of types of movies, there are a great number of contents, and some of them might bear a resemblance to others. This might lead to misconception between the company and the people.
On the other hand, despite the disadvantages above, I believe this trend could be beneficial to society. Since filmmaking is easily accessible, there would be a great number of opportunities for people who want to pursue filmmaking career. For example, there are many websites for manufacturing moving picture for amateur users with a cheaper price and easier to utilize. People later can publish their movies on free video-sharing such as Youtube, which attracts millions of viewers everyday. Therefore, people could discover a new talented filmmaker. In addition, these amateur filmmakers could contribute to the development of cinematography. Because big companies often focus on dominant genres or familiar topics such as superheros, romantic, and also their movies might be heavily censored. Meanwhile, small producers would tend to take advantage of unpopular genre and could transcend those barriers to create a miscellaneous products and add variety to the film industry.
In conclusion, while this trend could be disadvantageous, I believe this trend could be far more advantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ube, which attracts millions of viewers everyday. Therefore, people could discover a new...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36825396825 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04129635141 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568253968254 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0778374321 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9444444444 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228101980205 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713932607163 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507416576898 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133545339487 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566660506374 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.