Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and
historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with
this opinion?
more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments. I
completely disagree with this idea.
The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that
cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep
them going, which means that the resident population already pays
money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to
be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy
of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods
and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The
governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to
subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of
the world to visit them.
If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical
and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide
not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the
tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the
country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral.
These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this
helps to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists
stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient
funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.
In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists
from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more
than local residents.
-Simon-
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: More
more than local residents to visit important...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37451737452 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88017431135 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57528957529 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5586414186 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150858188952 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563253569288 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040747543727 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408785871166 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420548360087 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.