Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attraction. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It would be argued that visitors from overseas should be charged more than local people to visit cultural and heritage sites. I completely agree with this opinion.
It is certainly true that there are various reasonable reasons why foreign tourist should pay more than local residents when they get to an attraction. First of all, local people have contributed to protect and keep intact these places. For an example, every year, local people co-operate with organizations to hold the traditional festivals which many abroad visitors are interested in joining. It would be more beneficial to keep the customs last long and concurrently do advertise for region’s imagine. This is the precious contribution that the nearby residents have done for their hometown as well as for the cultural and historical places. So that, the local people are deserve to pay fewer than anyone coming from other nations.
Another reason is that there are many evidences proving that most of damage situations and shocking pictures are caused by overseas visitors. This originate from the lacks of knowledge and the different between cultural identity of each region. The differences between eastern and western made a lots senses of human. It is not difficult to find a western girl wearing short or kind of sexy clothes, getting to the temples or pagoda. It is an eyesore for local people because in eastern culture, people must wear elegant clothes when they visit there to show their respectation. To remind abroad tourist to respect regional tradition and to have them paid attention on what they would do in these places, they should be charged more.
In conclusion, charging the foreign visitors more on enhance fees in cultural and historical attractions is reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 681, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deserved'.
Suggestion: deserved
...l places. So that, the local people are deserve to pay fewer than anyone coming from ot...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, as for, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17132867133 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65533831292 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56993006993 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2575137709 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323175217346 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094143940531 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799023050503 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216458072726 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776516210019 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.