Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it positive or negative development?
In an incredible world that we live, nature always provides, from food to fuel. The intelligence of man is beyond the out reach that he updates everything to achieve a modern society with much of ease. So the question arises whether the supplies of nature sufficient? Is it good to squeeze them and later suffer the consequences or to think of other alternatives to meet our needs is discussed before giving the final verdict.
The usage of natural resources goes back to before Christ age. They used oil, coal as a covering of building , for cooking initially then he started using it for engines of Many motors in road, rail, air and water ways. It was sufficient for yester century people but as years pass on, the population is out of reach. If man continues to dig all the resources then it might cause imbalance in earth plates causing natural calamities such as earth quakes then followed by tsunami. Also, there's this dear that those natural resources will go extinct which is also a threat to the upcoming generations.
So, man opt to use an alternative methods to get energy like from air and water. Water falls and fans are used to extract energy. Actually these are the safest ways to get energy though so much of funding is needed to construct and maintain them. Despite it being expensive, there are many positives which ensures the safety of planet earth and it would not cause imbalance in the climatic conditions.
According to me, positives of using artificial sources out weigh the negatives. So, keeping in mind the safety of future generations it is best option to choose.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...used oil, coal as a covering of building , for cooking initially then he started u...
^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... quakes then followed by tsunami. Also, theres this dear that those natural resources ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'method'?
Suggestion: method
...s. So, man opt to use an alternative methods to get energy like from air and water. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...mbalance in the climatic conditions. According to me, positives of using artificial sources ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...ind the safety of future generations it is best option to choose.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78339350181 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5329999431 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635379061372 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.269230681 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118772445297 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373564720164 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491932607388 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760045578846 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427385676134 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...used oil, coal as a covering of building , for cooking initially then he started u...
^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... quakes then followed by tsunami. Also, theres this dear that those natural resources ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'method'?
Suggestion: method
...s. So, man opt to use an alternative methods to get energy like from air and water. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...mbalance in the climatic conditions. According to me, positives of using artificial sources ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...ind the safety of future generations it is best option to choose.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78339350181 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5329999431 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635379061372 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.269230681 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118772445297 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373564720164 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491932607388 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760045578846 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427385676134 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.