Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas, are used in many countries. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, is encouraged. Is this trend is a positive or negative development?
These days, the demanding fossil fuel, including coal oil and natural gas, have been increasing year on year. As a result, many countries import lots of coal to serve electrical generation, while some people argue that government should encourage inventing alternative power. Hopefully, this will be future source of energy. In this essay, I will discuss at both sides of the argument and give my opinion.
There are several positive sides of attempting invention of alternative energy sources. With advancement in modern technology, solar power and wind power are presented to feasible alternatives. For example, Poland is one amongst many countries which has great technology. It has set wind power stations to store energy when air flows through turbines. Others, such as France has solar panels which converse electricity from sunlight. It is clear that both countries currently reduce polluting the environment and releasing greenhouses gases during operation. Moreover, it is education that biomass, becoming the new generation of energy trend, is produced easily at small-scale at home or even farm. By this way, people can establish biomass factory which generates green fuel, selling to government later.
However every coin has two sides. It is important for current mobiles which use gasoline normally. Because their engines are changed difficulty to using other energy resources, for example, hydropower and liquefied petroleum gas. Furthermore, some group of countries, more commonly known simply as OPEC, have the ability to refine petroleum products by themselves. But, fossil fuel resources are diminishing, these countries will definitely dependent on alternative source of energy.
In conclusion, although it is commonly belief that utilizing alternative energy is not widespread use and effective as same as traditional energy, while others argue that it will be sustainable energy supply.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ming the new generation of energy trend, is produced easily at small-scale at hom...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n fuel, selling to government later. However every coin has two sides. It is importa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64359861592 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83187077809 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664359861592 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2424703191 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6111111111 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281330354897 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695152224494 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472527427904 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147799727267 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047040601252 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.