In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
It is undoubtedly the truth that modern technology is developing in a fast pace. Now, we have many computer-operated mechines although we are yet to have similar techonolgy in case of transportation. However, the scenerio is going to change in the near future. I believe that the change is going to be proven quite beneficial for the entire human race.
Driverless vehicles are more likely to lower the incidence of accidents. If highly accurate softwares are used in private or public vehicles, they can easily calculate the safest routes and thus less road accidents will occur. Moreover, human detection by the sensors will reduce the chance of running over someone. In this way, less time will be required for traveling as well. Also, traffic congestion can be avoided. Furthermore, inter-continental jouney by trains, which are run through computers, will become available for the public too. As a result, dependency and pressure on air travel can be alleviated. Finally, the such vehicles are more likely to run on electricity or solar power so the air pollution will be lessened. Currently, big companies like the Apple and the Tesla are working on automated cars and promoting them as cars from the future. Although these type of cars are now considered as luxury, soon they will be availble for the public usage.
On the contrary, unemployment may rise as many drivers and traffic handlers will loose their jobs. But the good news is that new job opportunities will rise for them as well which can be achieved by training. Hacking of the software-run vehicles, specially aeroplanes, will become a newly found threat. So, the police will also hire new officers to control them.
To conclude, changes are always welcomed in a society and when they are for the good reasons, they are celebrated widely. Even though driverless travelling may has to suffer some type of backlash in the begining, people will eventually accept them as they will be benefiited greatly from using them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... many drivers and traffic handlers will loose their jobs. But the good news is that n...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04848484848 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83375300732 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0796009649 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265654199141 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772829452807 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06046172547 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142544868806 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852212266096 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.