In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the upcoming years, it is predictable that people have to cope with more and more hurdles in order to sustain their lives on Earth. As a result, many governments are encouraged to invest more in astrological research to find out an alternative planet for human. However, personally, I partly agree with this viewpoint because of the following reasons
On the one hand, it is apparent that life on Earth will be much more difficult in the near future owing to two main aspects. First of all, as the population has risen at an unprecedented rate as well as the increase in territory for human cultivation and habitation, it is possible that the future generation may not find enough space to live. In addition, a host of natural resources is also running up, leading to the disappearance of many fossil fuels such as coal, gas, … Consequently, many factors that ensure human’s well-being may have to come to an end, which is impossible for people to continue living on this planet
On the other hand, although it is cruel if the world just stays intact from maintaining human’s life on this planet, it is still so wasteful and unnecessary if authorities pour money down the drain as to seek another planet. Exploring and doing research on the universe demands a huge amount of money while there is no guarantee of success. Moreover, there are multiple countries that have to suffer from poverty, famine, or war, Which should be supported more rather than space
To conclude, although space exploration has always been a topic of interest. From my perspective, I endorse the view that research on the universe should not receive so much attention and money as there are other urgent issues that need to be tackled
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people to continue living on this planet On the other hand, although it is cruel ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, as to, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84797297297 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7195736108 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.214685579 49.4020404114 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.375 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 20.5 7.06120827912 290% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306813253752 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122701133712 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563119298372 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169435284114 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544594458969 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 11.3001002004 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.