In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement?
Predictions reveal that nobody will purchase traditional books and newspapers as there have been many sources of information allowing people to read without paying. In my opinion, although I agree that online tools can help reduce buying costs for readers, the traditional materials will not be replaced.
It is clear that the internet has been an almost unlimited source of free information since it was invented. Thanks to it, people may stay up-to-date on the latest news within their country and even the world without paying for purchasing materials. To illustrate, people can get nearly anything they want for free on Google, one of the famous social networking sites for its convenience in recent years, with only a keyword. In comparison, those who read printed books or newspapers usually have to invest money to buy or rent them from libraries. Moreover, the amount of time to search for the material they are in need in libraries or book stores can be longer than online.
Nevertheless, I strongly believe that the role of the traditional sources of information will not be overshadowed as they provide readers with reliable news. This is because there are usually criticisms giving comments for authors and publishers check the content whether it is reliable and correct or not before books are published. By contrast, there seem to be few online pages are censored in terms of contents, which can lead to wrong perceptions or misunderstandings to readers, especially children who usually are targeted by villains. For example, Momo, one of the evil programs broadcast on the Internet, induced children to hurt themselves with sharp tools. Therefore, online information can have adverse impacts on readers as they are publicized without censoring by trustworthy people.
In conclusion, although I agree that online materials are free and convenient as people do not have to pay for them, printed books and newspapers will still exist and be not overshadowed in the future with their reliability.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18769230769 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85209359416 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.5287565351 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303163252751 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102525782659 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738208936017 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204453586871 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531201162322 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.