In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries.
Is it a positive or negative development?
It is estimated that in the future there will be a more increasing percentage of aged people than that of youthful ones in a majority of nations all over the world. In my opinion, this is completely a negative tendency.
Some advocates of aging population favor this trend for some reasons. One reason is focused investment in well-being facilities and services. It means that in a society with a large number of aging people, its authority would take more care of citizens’ needs and happiness by erecting heath establishments and supplying services of basic necessities. For example, within big cities in Japan, where old people constitute more than 65% of the urban population, thousands of medical centers and private hospitals have been built so as to satisfy standard living requirements. Because of this, most national budget is annually used for infrastructure as well as regional facilities for such dominant groups of people.
Having said that, I strongly believe that the growing quantity of elderly residents would definitely cause more trouble for a community. Firstly, there are shortages of energetic employees. Young workers, in general, are more physically fit and therefore can work longer hours with superior effectiveness compared to the aged counterparts. Thus, a company full of old workers cannot yield a tremendous amount of profit, which would badly affect the entire economy of a country in the long run. Secondly, foreign investments are unlikely to be poured into the country. This is because overseas sponsors only have a preference for the nations with a large percentage of youngsters. They commonly believe the more young employees are in a location the more economic potentials are and dynamic the market is. The ageing population represents the contrary certainly. Thirdly, the image of a country would be influence in a negative fashion if it has a lot of old nationals. The typical instance is Japan; when thinking about this country, many people would describe it as a place with a rapid aging population, which brings more drawbacks than benefits to the whole society. It is expressed that in about a century, hundreds of villages would disappear forever as there are no descendants.
In summary, the aged population taking a major proportion of people in the future is a completely negative trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rvices. It means that in a society with a large number of aging people, its authority would take ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...stablishments and supplying services of basic necessities. For example, within big cities in Japa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s and private hospitals have been built so as to satisfy standard living requirements. B...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 914, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative fashion" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e image of a country would be influence in a negative fashion if it has a lot of old nationals. The t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, as to, for example, in general, in summary, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18469656992 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90475795648 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583113456464 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2973516134 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.421052632 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183757466636 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525788335104 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069684355095 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153796918392 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075453872607 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.