Gender pay gap hasn’t closed in the UK, despite commitment from company bosses that they would not discriminate against women at work. Thus, some people think that the government should fine those companies heavily to address this imbalance. Discuss.
It is fact that gender wage gap still exists in many companies all over the world. There could be many reason why this is the case, and I believe that government should deal with this imbalance.
There are various reason that many companies have the difference between women and men average earnings. The first reason is occupational segregation, the clustering of female and male workers in particular occupations. Female-dominated occupations are lower paid than those dominated by man, while many positions require male workers. Secondly, with the similar job, women may not perform as well as men, because of their strength, or healthy reasons. The other reason is unconscious bias, in many companies, recruitment department have negative opinions that influence about career progression of women in workforce. They think that men ability is better than women, while the fact is wrong. It is fact that female workers is more industrious, meticulous, and diligent than male workers.
In my opinion, government and companies should pay attention to support female workers. Companies have to create targets for apprenticeships and aim to 50:50 recruitment, apprenticeships are publically fund but at the moment, the one in the highest paid dominated by men. Government should require employers to reveal their gender pay gap and commit to plan it to right, alongside this there is meaningful penalties for who do not comply. Women should be given more flexible work, better maternity-leave policies, and free childcare. When they retire, government must pay equal pensions to male and female workers.
In conclusion, I believe that equal policies could support women workers and their life, remove gender inequality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are meaningful penalties'?
Suggestion: there are meaningful penalties
...mit to plan it to right, alongside this there is meaningful penalties for who do not comply. Women should be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... this there is meaningful penalties for who do not comply. Women should be given mo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40520446097 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92983503533 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557620817844 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0866881363 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208016651436 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708239737112 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506291224429 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127165554935 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701077555668 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.