Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think?
Nowadays, unemployment-related problems have become more debatable, While some say the authority needs to provide only primary schooling only and no secondary education. In this essay, I will why people have this type of view and why I disagree with them.
To comment with, when the government stops providing higher educations to their citizens, it reduces the number of higher-paying jobs and further developments in education. This has resulted in saving more funds, which will lead to building many medical and health care services. If the number of scientists, engineers, researchers, and many more decreases, for instance, the governing people do not need to invest more funds, which helps in the import of various things. Hence, the more people do not have higher education, the fewer laboratories and factories require.
On the other hand, if governments have more emphasis on education, many learners will have a chance to find their interests. This will lead them to invent new things, which may be very useful to solve dangerous consequences such as sea-level rise, global warming, and other natural disasters in the future. when many new technologies will develop by people, which make our lives easier and create a positive impact on nature. Therefore, the more education people have, the more developments will occur.
In conclusion, although a huge amount of money was saved in other important aspects of the economy, it is more important to educate the next generations. In my words, despite having some problems in terms of employment, it is more advantageous when more citizens learn in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... other natural disasters in the future. when many new technologies will develop by p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23754789272 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91673822962 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60153256705 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3013255648 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.916666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119656706379 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477828662155 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595256192624 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078584549594 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440924080324 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.