Giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than the positive effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Globally, the issue of whether developed countries should support poorer countries has been a topic of discussion for many years. Some people think international aid brings more drawbacks, like developing countries being highly dependent on foreign nations, while this essay will argue that it is advantageous for both rich and poor countries.
To begin with, aid and supports from other places enable the government in disadvantageous countries to pursue and maintain social stability. Increasing job opportunities and cheaper commodities would be available if well-developed countries provide financial support, medical help, or technical assistance to less-developed ones, where most residents hardly make a decent life. For instance, many African countries steadily make progress without conflicts, wars and chaos partly thanks to the continuous humane assistance from other countries, stabilising the whole area and improving people’s living standards. Thus, it is definitely beneficial for poor countries.
In addition, helping under-developed countries can also benefit richer countries through international cooperation. With the economic development brought by global aid, people in the developing countries will have more disposable savings, thereby stimulating the need for consumption and international business. This means that rich countries may explore a significantly huge potential market where they are able to make profits in a long run. In this case, it is worthwhile to aid poorer nations.
In conclusion, this essay has argued that helping under-developed countries has a positive influence on both help-givers and receivers. Around the world, human beings will live in a better place if richer countries keep supporting poorer ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries keep supporting poorer ones.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97244094488 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18022762199 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665354330709 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1000901275 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132766719009 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583624146983 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313771987542 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939845735034 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269041621304 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.