Global environment issues are the responsibility of richer nations, not the poorer ones.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
As environmental problems are rapidly destroying the globe that we rely on for survival, there’s been debate on whose responsibility it is to address these enormous problems. While some believe that nations who have acquired their prosperity through exploitation of the environment are saddled solely with this responsibility. It is my view that all countries including the less wealthy ones must play a role in curbing this menace.
It is true that developed countries are first at industrialization; a process which produces a huge amounts of pollutants like emission of greenhouse gases. At the same time, it allowed these nations become extensively rich leading to uncontrolled urbanization and further deterioration of our habitation as opposed to the undeveloped countries. As a result, these countries should solely provide funding for environmental protection.
However, these issues are an around-the-world problem which wealthy nations cannot solve alone. Despite, urbanization and industrialization being some major contributory factors, the biggest threat to environmental health is people. The vast global polluters are people living in both developed, developing and underdeveloped countries. In other words, even if the wealthier nations take actions, it will be inconsequential if most of the world is still pumping deleterious emissions into the atmosphere.
To sum up, poor countries often argue that their counterpart gained their wealth by abusing the environment as such should take responsibility, contrarily, I believe that environmental issues poses grave risk to humanity, as such, it is a collective responsibility among all nation to proffer solution in preserving the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... is to address these enormous problems. While some believe that nations who have acqu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'amount'?
Suggestion: amount
...zation; a process which produces a huge amounts of pollutants like emission of greenhou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, while, as a result, in other words, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81746031746 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51389281009 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662698412698 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1349520877 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.272727273 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118226192344 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386919294774 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307604811 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682263976666 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288858981612 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.