The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?
It is often claimed that the authority should give more endowment to schools with the aim of facilitating the process of teaching sciences, which will help to boost the national development. From my point of view, I totally agree with this statement due to its potential merits.
First and foremost, there is no denying that not only students but also the society can reap a plethora of benefits from learning science subjects such as math, physics, chemistry, etc. Initially, it plays an integral part in raising people’s intellectual, which makes them instill the momentousness of the natural resources accompanied by conscious of the seriousness of many global scientific challenges. As a result, they definitely take proactive measures to make our planet the most livable place.
Another outstanding point is that not only does this scientific expertise upgrade the educational outcome but it also promotes the national socio-economic development. In respect to Third World nations, majoring in sciences is the key which is the golden opportunity to get access as well as keep pace with modern technology, intensify the productivity of work, stimulate the economic advancement and narrow the enormous gap with other countries. In relation to some developed countries, human beings keep doing thorough research about the nature and universe in the hope of detecting many other renewable resources or discovering life on other planets. This is the most efficacious way of finding solutions to many challenging issues facing the entire world.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that the government should allocate more financial aids along with latest facilities to stimulate the spirit of learning and teaching sciences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...ould allocate more financial aids along with latest facilities to stimulate the spirit of l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, third, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45724907063 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01145989527 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661710037175 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8014705695 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.8 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134573058159 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444984423439 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471575380015 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816066207693 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041074950366 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.