The government should control the amount of violence in films and televisions in order to decrease the level of violent crimes in the society. Do you agree or disagree ?
Many people argue that the authorities should take charge of the violent scenes in films and televisions so that people cannot get access to them. Therefore, it will result in the fall of the crime rate in the society. While I accept that this may suit many people, I believe that others may benefit from watching them
On the one hand, there is a variety of reasons why violent scenes should be reduced in movies and TV programmes. One reason is that the youngsters can easily affected by the surrounding environment and if they watch a violent movie, they will have a tendency to mimic what they have seen people do. Violent films are likely to breed the offenders as the more films they watch, the more cruel they can be. Furthermore, when people watch the characters bullying other people in the movies they will think it is legal to do the same thing. Consequently, the rise of violent crimes in the community strems from watching violent scenes in films and televisions.
Apart from the disadvantages expressed above, I believe that the benefits of watching that kind of movies should not be overlooked. Firstly, some people can realise their passion through watching movies so that they can develop a career in the future. My next-door neighbor, for example, is currently an action actor. He attributes his chosen profession to the fact that when he was young, he was inspired after watching Close Escape movie, which is filled with thrilling action scenes and being all the rage at that time. Secondly, watching violent movies is one of the common way to relieve the burdens people nowadays are suffering. By seeing the characters beating bad guys, people feel comfortable and relaxing after a hectic day with lots of discontent.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that the government should take the violent scenes in films and televisions into consideration before realising to the public, but this is by no means the key factor for everybody in committing a crime.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89020771513 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60474635469 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540059347181 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0805473661 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152375962121 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605475023493 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577239021754 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112795931895 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565107202075 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.