The government should encourage industries and business to move out of big cities and into regional areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued that the government should encourage companies and organisations relocated from urban cities to rural areas. While I accept that this action may sometimes have a negative effect, I believe that they are more likely to have a majority benefits to business and industries.
On the one hand, there are some minor disadvantages caused by transferring companies to regional locations. Infrastructures are often less develop in small cities, which can deter the evolution of a company. For instance, out-of-date devices and poor internet connection lead to the unproductive work of labours. As a result, this reduces the profits of organisations. Secondly, employees in rural areas might be plentiful, but they are not as skilled and experienced as those in metropolis cities.
However, I would argue that these drawbacks are outweighed by the positives. Firstly, cities centre are now suffering from traffic congestion due to a large number of companies. This problem could be solved easily by moving factories and workers to suburb places. Another positive impact is that the cost of buying land, renting spaces and running their operations in small towns is cheaper than in large cities. For example, workers in rural areas can be hired for a lower salary, thus, employers could spend their budget on other vital aspects. Furthermore, local communities usually support the arrival entrepreneurs, as they provide jobs for local residents. Consequently, this could be a good start for a new start-up business.
In conclusion, even though moving companies far away from megacities to remote regions might be difficult, it seems to me that the potential dangers are less significant than the possible benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty benefits to business and industries. On the one hand, there are some minor di...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erienced as those in metropolis cities. However, I would argue that these drawba...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...uffering from traffic congestion due to a large number of companies. This problem could be solved...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39114391144 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96313409565 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645756457565 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.817066075 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114446941393 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350419304728 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524244425713 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707735723037 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437438017863 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.