The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country's development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that science subjects is probably significant than another subject in a developed country for investment. While I believe that this statement could be encouraged, I do not agree with the decision of government investments in science education only.
Paying attention to science fields can be seen as beneficial. First and foremost, scientific breakthroughs rely on knowledge of maths, physics, chemistry. Medicine is a typical example to show that science knowledge plays a vital role in making it. As a result, teaching quality of science subjects needs to be improved. Secondly, studying science subjects encourages creativity and imagination because when studying them people have to find solutions to many problems. Therefore, creativity and imagination are important for technological innovations.
However, government should also take notice of other subjects. Nowadays, international trade contributes to economic development. It is impossible to trade with other countries if language barriers exist. Consequently, the executive branch need to invest in teaching foreign languages. For instance, Vietnamese can work with foreigners and widen opportunities to apply for international bodies. As a result, the country attracts investments from other nations.
In conclusion, developing in teaching science will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on a country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 202.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9702970297 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26274806697 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.663366336634 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9915860374 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4666666667 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316967742473 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899353945246 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664974908333 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178185580865 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789220791401 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.75 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.