Government should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment. Do you agree or disagree?
Since time immemorial, governments promulgate effective rules to protect the environment; numerous residents, however, are reluctant to follow them. Therefore, I concur with this stance that authorities should raise citizens’ awareness to preserve their surrounding environment because it is their responsibility and the environment is aggravating
To commence with, humans, nowadays, are depending on the environment, so people have a duty to protect the environment in order to make use of their benefits for a long-standing time. Environment not only provides human valuable resources but also their food, materials for industry. Should residents not safeguard their living zone, they will no longer utilize advantages from the environment. Humans cannot imagine that if they do not have the support of the environment, they will face a myriad of strugglings. A case of this point is human deforestation for their own purposes, which leads to the lack of wood for manufacturing paper. Therefore, governments need to give some regulations to raise humans’ responsibility to preserve the environment.
Furthermore, the environment is becoming deteriorating by human-induced pollution, thus it is necessary to prohibit harmful actions for the environment. To be honest, the consciousness of people in the role of protecting their local environment is not good, they usually do detrimental activities such as throwing out the rubbish into the river or cutting trees. Conspicuously, these actions were and are damaging humans’ living space. Notice that problems, rules are banned by the government to safeguard the environment being crucial.adj
To sum up, it is vital to authorities to enact regulations for locals to save their surrounding environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility and the environment is aggravating To commence with, humans, nowadays, are ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... To commence with, humans, nowadays, are depending on the environment, so people have a du...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73764258555 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39062031916 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596958174905 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.2925740541 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.181818182 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293380858404 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100296154582 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661303577484 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172268037943 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384014081505 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.