The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems, and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming.
To what extent do you agree?
It is widely argued that the authority should spend more money on pressing and more dangerous problems like global warming and reduce its spending on domestic environmental issues. I strongly disagree with this point of view, as I believe that attempting to solve local environmental problems could be more beneficial.
First of all, all of today's serious environmental problems such as climate change are the result of pollution at the local level. This is because the local environment is undeniably a part of the global environment. For example, global warming happens as a consequence of an increasing amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by cities around the world.
Furthermore, taking action on local matters would certainly raise environmental awareness among local residents, which encourages them to take more responsible actions in terms of the global environment. A key reason for this is that the effects of many small actions quickly add up. For instance, if each person in a large metropolitan area chose to walk or take the bus instead of driving for one day a week, the reduction in air pollution would be absolutely huge. While it is true that one person working alone in a given region cannot make a significant difference, a group of people working together in all local communities can have a dramatic positive effect.
In conclusion, although it is critical for the government to increase money for the most important and high-priority issues, I think that the government should also keep on increasing funding into local problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19291338583 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97375472869 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610236220472 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5443739665 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295010436737 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106266404988 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723319510206 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181399762713 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598609887925 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.