Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, the idea that government should spend more taxes on railways instead of on roads has gained in popularity. Although spending on railways has its own advantages, roads ’investment benefit citizens in more aspects.
Transparently, in further future, road fixing sounds more economical than the railway one. First, in order to rebuild or replace railways, it requires high-skilled workers and high-technology machines while the substitutes of roads are more commonly produced and, therefore, less expensive. In reality, railways or trains are not popular means of transport in Vietnam, which means that large spending on them at the expense of on roads is not capable. Second, since railways are located in rural areas, it takes time and labors to fix or upgrade some components. For instance, if the road paths are minor broken, the locals can utilize their households to avoid danger rather than waiting for papers and government’s decisions.
Moreover, roads provide people with more convenience. First, through centuries, as roads are paths for vehicles and commuters while trains serviced only passengers, roads offer citizens with various choices, In particular, people use cars, motorbikes and other means of transport on roads but not on railways. Finally, using roads makes people less reliant on time and schedules. For instance, hurry businessmen can choose taxis; university students can catch daily buses at the rate of money they are willing to pay and receive the equal quality.
In conclusion, the benefits of roads, in term of economical saving and convenience, outweighs those of railways, therefore, more money should be spent on the former. Otherwise, the limited taxes could not cover both targets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47583643123 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90011434301 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3498554241 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139200083366 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531752033269 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457200254076 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927588206631 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039582184499 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.