In recent years, government focus on improving quality of life, that would bring a lot benefits for citizens. Such as, communication, transportation, health care. Some argument that built railways is more useful for local people than roads. In my opinion, it is good idea that more train station is built. There are some reasons.
First of all, it reduced pollution when more people give up driving to work in weekday. Nowadays, people spend a lot of time on the road in rush hours. At the same time, emissions of car bring a pollution in our environment. People easily get upset, if they got into traffic jam for longtime. Research has shown that it is get more pollution of air that car stopped on the road without cutting power. Train station is a good way to make easy that train never could get into congestion and train is a public transport which is more helpful to reduce air pollution.
Secondly, it solved congestion on the road while many people commute by train, nearly years, a number of car is growing. So, a question that a number of cars is over volume of road is following. This caused traffic jam have being horrible problem. However, the train will take more people to go to their destinations without waiting on road in rush hour. It is more convenient for citizen.
Finally, taking public transport is cheaper than private vehicle. People could save money to do others they interested.
Overall, government pays more money for building railway. It brings more it is a good decision that advantages than drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pollution'.
Suggestion: pollution
...t the same time, emissions of car bring a pollution in our environment. People easily get u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84528301887 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5740828379 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3200814175 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.2 106.682146367 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.25 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.085722498917 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296015636839 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446389134261 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680475343881 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480803024982 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.0946893788 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.96 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.