The government should spend money on railways rather than on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Excellent transport system reflects a city's prosperity. Government is obliged to spend a major proportion of economy on transportation means depending upon distribution of area and need for public convenience. I agree with the statement that the government should spend money on railways compared to roadways. This essay intends to explore the benefits of spending money on railways before forming a conclusion.
Firstly, railways system is convenient to ubiquitous population. When implemented properly, travelling through train greatly reduces the time of travelling. In the contemporary world, ‘time is considered as money’, where when the time is saved, it is utilised for other important aspects of life. For example in the city, Hyderabad, extensive metro rails are built spreading along vast area from north to south covering more than 200 km. Such a terrific transport system ensured ease for the citizens of the city and saved hours of travelling from one corner to another. Conventionally, people used to travel for about three hours to reach periphery by means of roads opposed by traffic and signals.
Secondly, railways are much safer compared to roadways as much life threatening accidents rarely happen on trains. When travelling for major distances such for more than a thousand miles, preferring a route through railways is best. Also, the public railways costs less compared to taxis and buses.
However, building a full fledged railways requires the huge amount of money for the raw material and skilled engineers from other nations. So, the government has to put a benchmark effort for the long-term advantages of the railway system.
To sum up, I agree that the government should make explicit advances and spend major portion in providing public railways to the people to get benefitted mutually.
</span>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'railway'?
Suggestion: railway
.... However, building a full fledged railways requires the huge amount of money for t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57586206897 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21004850664 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6361195652 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20720921419 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782043077213 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112372776982 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129196091338 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776265869966 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.