Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the contemporary society, there are various kinds of transportation which play a crucial role in our daily life. To enhance this system, an idea has been proposed that governmental organizations should invest more money in railways rather than normal roads. Personally, I strongly agree with this point of view because of several benefits it may bring as follows.
From an individual perspective, this recommendation is suitable for people from all walks of life because it is reasonably-priced and safe. This public transport system can also lower the rate of accidents and social maladies such as kidnap rather than automobile so that it is also reliable for young children. For example, it costs a fortune to buy a personal car and few people can afford it. Therefore, Japanese government have provided subways with a reasonable cost with the purpose of making the traveling more convenient and safer for their citizens.
On the environmental level, railways are believed to help reduce daily emission. As the number of personal transports has been increasing rapidly, the amount of carbon dioxide released from these engines nowadays is higher than ever before. To deal with this serious problem, every single individual should use this kind of public transport instead of their own cars or bikes. Constructing more railways is the appropriate solution and should be carried out as soon as possible.
In conclusion, the opinion that governments should change the shift of their spending from roads to railways is worth supporting as it upgrades the quality of commuting among residents. Also, since environmental issues are at an alarming level, this idea needs to be brought into reality immediately before it is too late.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25899280576 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90809485444 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636690647482 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9385504668 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245155887272 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765187195803 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613524906521 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144174702522 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369935928094 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.