Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this era of modernization, artwork has undergone lots of dramatic changes over the past few decades. Presently, government is tend to endorse artists to glorify their country's name in art sector. However, some people does not welcome this tendency of government and consider it wastage of finance. Here, I would like to discuss both views with my notion.
multifarious points are there to shore up former view. Firstly, Artwork portrays the heritage and cultural picture of a particular country. Fascinating performances by artists in art sector glorify a country's name and earn fame for a country. However, spending on artwork is completely justifying. What is more, it takes special skills and patience to be a mesmerising artist. Thus it is worth to spend on skilful artists in order to justify their talent. On contrary, others have conflicting views.
They claim that, artwork being created by artists is of no use, hence, money ought to be utilized in other needful causes. To be specific, Indian government wasted gigantic 2 millions on R.S.Javed for an art exhibition which could have been utilized as an aid for tsunami affected in 2007. Furthermore, artwork is not that necessary for the better lifestyle, money can be spent on creating opportunities for jobless youngster instead
In my notion, both sides have their own significance. undeniably, some brilliant artists need to be awarded for sake of country's name and fame. however, paying them big amounts without taking local mass's needs in consideration is completely unjustifiable
To recapitulate, it is rightly said that "every sword has two edges". However, government should contend local masses by fulfilling their needs along with rewarding artists in a affordable way
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...t few decades. Presently, government is tend to endorse artists to glorify their cou...
^^^^
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Multifarious
...to discuss both views with my notion. multifarious points are there to shore up former vie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nd patience to be a mesmerising artist. Thus it is worth to spend on skilful artists...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Javed
...nment wasted gigantic 2 millions on R.S.Javed for an art exhibition which could have ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undeniably
...both sides have their own significance. undeniably, some brilliant artists need to be awar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ded for sake of countrys name and fame. however, paying them big amounts without taking...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a affordable way" with adverb for "affordable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...heir needs along with rewarding artists in a affordable way
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r needs along with rewarding artists in a affordable way
^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25625 0.247107183377 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.178125 0.155533422707 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.09375 0.0946595960268 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046875 0.0501214627716 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.040625 0.0437548338989 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121875 0.122226691241 100% => OK
Participles: 0.053125 0.0403226058552 132% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94349260461 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.034375 0.0326793684256 105% => OK
Particles: 0.003125 0.00163938923432 191% => OK
Determiners: 0.05625 0.0861772015684 65% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015625 0.021408717616 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00625 0.011925033212 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1757.0 1933.35771543 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 316.048096192 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29749103943 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412186379928 0.374742101984 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.358422939068 0.28420135186 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222222222222 0.203846283523 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129032258065 0.137316102897 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94349260461 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.037074148 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637992831541 0.56093040696 114% => OK
Word variations: 73.3371070251 60.7387585426 121% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.4117647059 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9316281819 49.517814964 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.352941176 127.492653851 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.529411764706 0.814263465372 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.99599198397 200% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 52.2540586127 49.1944974215 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.62352941176 1.69124875643 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263787917112 0.332605444948 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.058312877992 0.102741220458 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0518167233488 0.0668466124924 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.445672239772 0.534860350844 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111982711015 0.148594505496 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922861369267 0.134430193775 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460485605288 0.0742795772207 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.210573279592 0.324371583561 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0594573931762 0.0638462369009 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155071273362 0.228012699653 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052475129327 0.058150111329 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.