In current scenario, the amount of traditional energies diminishing at a faster rate, as well as it is harmful to our nature .Thus, I strongly believe governments have to make more effort in order to find new energy sources.
The first and foremost reason for the above argument is, traditional sources of energy diminishing day by day. The usage of one of the main source of energy fossil fuels increased rapidly in the recent three decades as the number of vehicles soaring. Fossil fuels are limited and we cannot reproduce it to meet our increasing needs. OPEC nations already made statements regarding the over use of fossil fuels . From the beginning of motor transportation mankind depend on petrol and diesel to run vehicles.To meet the current crises due to scarcity of energy, governments must continuously fund the research groups, until they find a new energy source. For example, in the USA scientists recently find an alternative for fossil fuels called shale gas and other governments around the globe also should promote such activities.
Another important point is, energy sources, which is using currently is polluting the environment in an alarming rate. Fossil fuels produces carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide which are harmful for the human beings as well as the other living creatures equally. Children in big cities suffers a lot of breathing problems due to these toxic gasses. But unfortunately, we do not have an alternative for fossil fuels. For instance, the last month Delhi city shut down for one week because of the content of these gasses soared up beyond the limits. Therefore, governments should take initiative to find new energy sources, which is not harmful to the society as well as the nature.
To conclude, i strongly feel that government around the world spend enough money to find new energy sources so that we can face the crises related to scarcity of energy and pollution due to current energy sources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., as well as it is harmful to our nature .Thus, I strongly believe governments hav...
^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...as well as it is harmful to our nature .Thus, I strongly believe governments have to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in order to find new energy sources. The first and foremost reason for the ab...
^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s regarding the over use of fossil fuels . From the beginning of motor transporta...
^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of fossil fuels . From the beginning of motor transportation mankind depend on p...
^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...nd on petrol and diesel to run vehicles.To meet the current crises due to scarcity...
^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtant point is, energy sources, which is using currently is polluting the environ...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duces carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide which are harmful for the human beings a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04953560372 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65797014446 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575851393189 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3110842973 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106705429383 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366673157761 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381597587797 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692023270879 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02428038774 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.