Governments should money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays there are many mass productions on vehicles rather than trains or any transportation. However, there was opinion that national policy must spend their budget on railways construction rather than roads. From the standpoint of flourishing vehicle transportation and how the scheme of the road in given region I should argue that request.
First of all, in Indonesia and many other development countries. Many famous vehicle companies, car-and-motorcycle manufacture, have already deployed their product on their country customer. Indonesia alone 60% of its people spend money on a motorcycle and the rest on a car. We should imagine how crowding the roads if every Indonesian household has 2 motorcycles and 1 car. Besides that, only 30% of its people who love to take on trains and Indonesia have enough support their need which is 10 conventional trains have already run smoothly. From that issue, we can think how politely Indonesia politicians if they concentrate on road service rather than railways.
The situation reversely obvious if wee look at the country Manufacturer, Japan is one of many countries that has their own car-and-motorcycle industries. Surprisingly, 80% of its society choose to take on trains rather than buying a car or motorcycle despite they build their own cars and motorcycles. It was shockingly fact that many customer countries come from developed rather than advance country.
From those facts, the government policy on transportation should look firstly on the society situation and needs before taking and action. If the majority of people take the advantages from the trains then railways service should be prioritized. Otherwise, if the number of population of vehicle is greater than the number of dwelling, railways expansion should be suspended momentarily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...ional policy must spend their budget on railways construction rather than roads. From th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and-motorcycle industries. Surprisingly, 80% of its society choose to take on tra...
^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion and needs before taking and action. If the majority of people take the advanta...
^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ansion should be suspended momentarily.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, then, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4219858156 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10873198857 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3336585347 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136490542238 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525939464797 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416912477141 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969200676286 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448396792356 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.