Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
These days, every country is coping with globalizing development as trading across the world, leading each government constructs more facilities. For example, infrastructure which connects urban areas and countrysides. Then, Investment in transportation is concerned with choosing worthily way by authorities. Some people believe that citizen, tourism, or even agricultural can be transferred through railways. I completely agree with this idea and I’m this essay I will support my opinion with examples
Firstly, a large number of cars have flowed on the road and cause traffic jam everyday, especially in intense city. In this case, setting train station with provided sufficient car park could attract people use it, rather than personal car. This approach would be expected to reducing terrible traffic relating with commuters.
Another reason why I agree with train as the best alternative vehicle is that agricultural products from countryside could be collected and carried to consumers in a large quantity. As a result, producers, middlemen, or even firms probably reduce the expenses from transportation. I strongly believe that this is an expectation from investor to spending their money, which raise more profit to whom it may concerns.
On the other hand, there is an argument that railway constructions can damage environment, for example, through deforestation and visual pollution. Many opposers are ofter concern about animals’ habitation may disturb. Furthermore, Some of them claiming that ancient architectures' view will be obscured by tall concrete pillars.
In conclusion, although it is a common belief that large-scale constructions will consume big budget and will affect to all aspects, I believe that setting express trains is too beneficial and that it lead civilization in the majority of country. Personally, I think government and all citizen should support railway constructions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rt my opinion with examples Firstly, a large number of cars have flowed on the road and cause ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...lowed on the road and cause traffic jam everyday, especially in intense city. In this ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, may, so, then, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72222222222 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13285278772 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673611111111 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5865155506 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.866666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178166750558 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504865838876 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497290627108 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837414220774 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386322005653 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.