Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
In a limitation of budget, governments who want to build a transportation system sometimes have to choose whether railroads they have to build first or roads. Regards to these options, I do agree that if the governments spend more budgets on railroads rather than roads. I have several reasons why I agree with this statement.
The first, a train on the railroads can carry more passengers than a bus on the roads. In railway carriage, it can bring 50 up to 75 passengers in one way. If a locomotive can take 10 railway carriages, it can take 500 – 750 passengers in one way. Compared with a bus, it only can bring 50 passengers in one way. Therefore transport using railroads more efficient than roads. The second, railways is a long term investment. For example railroads in Jakarta which connected it with the city around Jakarta, such as Bekasi, Bogor, and Serpong. These railroads have been built since Netherland governs in Indonesia. These railroads are still useful and bring millions of people in a day until now. The last, building the railroads means support environmental issue in reducing air pollution. Nowadays air pollution becomes a global concern. Therefore every country in this world has to make a concrete movement to support this campaign. The railroads and an electric train can become a good solution for this issue.
In conclusion, the governments who have a limitation in their budget, better to spend it to build the railroads because it is more efficient, durable and can support the go green issue. Nevertheless, if a government have good enough money, build railroads and roads simultaneously is the best way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nly can bring 50 passengers in one way. Therefore transport using railroads more efficien...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...air pollution becomes a global concern. Therefore every country in this world has to make...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97826086957 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86474855598 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5322840509 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3333333333 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19229229909 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673800650013 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724938263645 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150488906026 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807672008619 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.