When it involves public transportation, government faces the dilemma of whether to spend money on railways or roads. It seems that railways are more convenient compared with roads. However, I would argue that roads are just as important as railways.
The strategy of public transportation should be conducted according by the city’s own situation, including geography, culture and the idea of citizens, rather than develop the railways blindly. For example, if a city with a small population spends their fund to construct railways, there might be deficient passengers to use those railways and then resulting in a huge deficit, which is significantly hurt the economy.
On the other hand, roads have its own advantages for citizens to travel either long distances or short distances. In terms of long distances, high expressway provided an alternative approach to travel from one city to another, and, in particular, in a hilly city which is difficult to develop good railways. Similarly, although road transportation might not be fast as railways, but it can be more convenient due to its large number of station, which is means that citizens can take buses wherever they are.
To admit it or not, high speed railways, on of the greatest invention, is, in a way, beneficial to people and society as whole. It saves a lot of time when people travel a long distance, which cannot be imagine in old time. Nevertheless, this beneficial cannot outweigh considerable advantages of roads and railways cannot replace roads entirely.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that roads are equally important as railways, so government fun should not spend on railways rather than roads. I think variety public transportation makes our society better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...o admit it or not, high speed railways, on of the greatest invention, is, in a way...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, for example, i think, in particular, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19787985866 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96796650621 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2448847447 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.153846154 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171000944935 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671065001931 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862473997228 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115581955177 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859362904088 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.