Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Trains and cars are the major way of transportation and great deal of investment is requires in order to construct and run these smoothly. Whether the government should allocate more money for railways or roads is debatable issue. according to me, investing more on constructing roads would be feasible considering the fact that, it is cheaper , quicker to build and it is just more suitable for certain types of countries.
Firstly, when it comes to constructing, it is the money that comes first and it is a no brainer that building roads are far less expensive than building a complete train track. On top of that, most of the countries have already existing road system which would help to bring to the cost down even further. If any country wants to spec a certain amount of money for transportation the investing that money to build roads would offer them better outcome.
Secondly, building a new infrastructure requires time. This problem can be solved by building roads. Nowadays, many cities in the world are clogged with heavy traffic where building new roads can come into play. Especially, if the government is looking for a quick fix to the problem. It requires fir to ten years to build a new rail track where traffic problem can be solved a quicker time by investing on roads.
Finally, train system just does not match with every country's requirement. For example, Singapore is a country with few hundred kilometers and train line is not feasible in this size of land area. Not only Singapore but also it is applicable to any country with relatively small land space. Modern road system would allow people in and out of the city center at a quicker time. Therefore, for these kinds of countries investing on roads is more suitable.
In conclusion, trains and cars both are quite convenient way of transportation. Subjectively and objectively, investing on roads are practical, less expensive and quicker solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...r railways or roads is debatable issue. according to me, investing more on constructing r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: in my opinion; I think
...r railways or roads is debatable issue. according to me, investing more on constructing roads w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...considering the fact that, it is cheaper , quicker to build and it is just more su...
^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucting, it is the money that comes first and it is a no brainer that building roa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95705521472 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77893662292 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524539877301 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9684899615 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940640123568 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348354443294 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433217917547 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0485008763071 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246517551171 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.