Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Roads and railways are being built more and more recent years to meet the needs of transport systems. The idea that, governments should invest on railways instead of roads, remains in source of controversy. In my opinion, I totally agree with this idea.
First of all, in many hyge cities around the world, the sxistence of public trains and railways can reduce the rate of traffic congestion. For instance, millions Japanese can use underground tubes to travel day by day, which help to prevent traffic jam in rush hours in Tokyo. Apart from that, travelling by trains, which only require ticket fee, costs less expenses than travelling by individual transportations. Furthermore, public trains are also become more and more friendly with environment because they create less carbon emissions and other toxic waste. As a result, the money, which are used for protect environment, can be used for other purposes like healthcare, education, etc… instead.
In addition, the number of traffic accidents, which were caused by cars and motorbikes are more than by trains and public transportations. A research of National University showed that, eighty percents of traffic accidents were caused by individual transportations whereas only two percents of them were caused by trains and tubes. The most important reason is, when people feel sleepy on the trains, they can have a forty winks but they have to concentrate when drive motorbikes and cars. Apart from that, citizens can save a wealth of time because the speed of transportations which use railways are faster than the others.
In conclusion, trasportations which use railways have a lots more advantages while compared with which use roads. So, governments should spend money on building more railways from now on. This will absolutely bring to cities new perspectives and opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s, which only require ticket fee, costs less expenses than travelling by individual ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...n by trains and public transportations. A research of National University showed that, eig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... trasportations which use railways have a lots more advantages while compared with whi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, so, whereas, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29152542373 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86795688137 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1758667254 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156844067696 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632646324654 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678172239216 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12206448252 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811031378499 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.