Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
It is considered by some, and I agree, that governments ought allocate more budget on rail transport rather than roadways. Therefore, it could trigger people to commute with trains.
Firstly, putting more investment on the train system means people can commute faster around the city. This is because, unlike on roads, there is no traffic congestion on railways. Moreover, trains' speed is faster than cars or motorcycles. Jakarta, for example, the citizens are excited to travel to and from work these days in order to reduce commuting cost of time and money. Thus, this solution is suitable for other big cities with busy traffic
Secondly, trains are significantly safer than other road vehicles and nearly as safe as airplanes. It can be seen that trains crashes are very rare to occur, while car accidents usually happen every year. Also, they are operated by highly trained officers. In the other words, improving train railways would encourage people to not use their cars. As a result, it will decrease the number of accidents.
Finally, investing in railways means pollution can be reduced as well. It is known that trains can bring hundreds of passengers. Also, carbon emission from cars contributes 10% to global warming. This means, if people change their commuting way to trains, then this will reduce vehicle pollution and slow the process of climate change.
To sum up, governments should fund more on railway infrastructure in order to improve the quality of transportation and passengers’ experience. Other than that, this type of transport is more friendly to the environment as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: OUGHT_SAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ought to allocate'?
Suggestion: ought to allocate
... by some, and I agree, that governments ought allocate more budget on rail transport rather th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... very rare to occur, while car accidents usually happen every year. Also, they ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20689655172 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67639810653 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628352490421 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5448011535 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9411764706 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3529411765 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105839431102 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031158324213 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404426728215 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647027909294 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367178795988 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.