Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent years, the trasport system has been changed towards their means of ways. People thought that governing bodies need to change their attentions from roads to inter-country railway network. I storngly agree with this statement and in the course of the essay, I will describe arguments.
Firstly, railway system develop for each cetagories of communities which can travel on it and it is cheaper then any other mood of transportation. Individuals to family can travel togather and it can create more conection between peoples because in train large number of people sit togather from different school of thought. For example, India had almost each religion, if people can use train to get their destination, between their journay the can learn about others society. Due to this it would develop tolerance to listen others point of view. In addition, they are able to save money because if they travel by private car that cost more and not so good for environment.
Secondly, these days carbon emission is a major danger to global warming. On road people travel by own vehical which burn fossil fuels and exhusat green house gases which is main reason behind the increase of earth temperature. However, if government make more railway lines which create less pollution. For instence, 2000 people tarvel by own vehicals by using around 1000 cars that produce significant amount of carbon in comparison of rail.
In conclusion, travelling by rail is much cheaper then other ways of transportation, however it gives chance to konw about others. It also better for environment and longterm pollution problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cheaper than'?
Suggestion: cheaper than
...nities which can travel on it and it is cheaper then any other mood of transportation. Indiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
... each religion, if people can use train to get their destination, between their journa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lution. For instence, 2000 people tarvel by own vehicals by using around 1000 ca...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people tarvel by own vehicals by using around 1000 cars that produce significan...
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cheaper than'?
Suggestion: cheaper than
... conclusion, travelling by rail is much cheaper then other ways of transportation, however i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ion, travelling by rail is much cheaper then other ways of transportation, however i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...es chance to konw about others. It also better for environment and longterm pollution ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13688212928 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65262474703 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6463878327 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0673972288 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0942459561059 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362643108905 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527444206639 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605646307585 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619535114445 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.