Governments should spend money on railways rather
than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an ongoing controversy argument that whether governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Some people think that road is more suitable than railways. However, in my opinion, I believe that spending money on railways can make more benefit than use it for roads for several reasons.
First, train is the cheaper way to travel the car or bus. People should get the valuable public transport with the minimum cost and the government should provide the sufficient support for people. Because a train can carry more than a hundred people, it is one of the most economical transportation. For instance, in my country, the train cost only 5 pounds to travel from Bangkok to Chiangmai, compared to the bus, which cost 12 pounds. Clearly, the train is the low-price transportation than road vehicle, so the governments should invest on railways more to ensure that people in their countries get the reasonable public transportation.
Second, the railways’ system emit less pollution than the other transport in roads’ system. Nowadays, most cars still need oil to make to possible move. Consequently, the carbon that was produced from the car engines will damage the environment and harm the living creatures. In contrast, the trains can use other clean energy, such as electricity, to propel the train instead of oil. This innovation reduces the significant level of environment problems that humans are now terrified. So the government ought to persuade people to use this clean technology by spending more money on the railways, rather than the roads.
In conclusion, investing on railways contributes more benefits on roads. It brings the cheaper way of transportation and causes less pollution to the environment. I believe that the world will be better if the governments invest more on the railways.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.287833827893 0.247107183377 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.115727002967 0.155533422707 74% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0860534124629 0.0946595960268 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0385756676558 0.0501214627716 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0237388724036 0.0437548338989 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13056379822 0.122226691241 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0178041543027 0.0403226058552 44% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.90278794731 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0326409495549 0.0326793684256 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106824925816 0.0861772015684 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0296735905045 0.021408717616 139% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00593471810089 0.011925033212 50% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1840.0 1933.35771543 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 316.048096192 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21621621622 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.39527027027 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287162162162 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209459459459 0.203846283523 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138513513514 0.137316102897 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90278794731 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.037074148 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537162162162 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 54.8998551208 60.7387585426 90% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4117647059 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5039838887 49.517814964 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.235294118 127.492653851 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.814263465372 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 46.1279809221 49.1944974215 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.45 1.69124875643 145% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156881878208 0.332605444948 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0868851244834 0.102741220458 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0583237594386 0.0668466124924 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564647833628 0.534860350844 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126182523188 0.148594505496 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763477021776 0.134430193775 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625691470298 0.0742795772207 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.399724964983 0.324371583561 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.168318957677 0.0638462369009 264% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127299654381 0.228012699653 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373572276395 0.058150111329 64% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.