The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.
The bar graphs illustrates how many men and women work in six different sectors in the Republic of Freedonia between 1975 and 1995.
It is clear that in 1975 all six employment sectors are dominated by men. Some significant changes could be seen in the communications and wholesale and retail sale in the following two decades.
In 1975, 250,000 women worked in communications compared to 300,000 of men. The same gender gap could be seen in banking finance and wholesale and retail trade which witnessed differences of 300,000 and 100,000 respectively. However, in the following twenty years, the number of female communication and wholesale and retail trade employees increased significantly to 600,000 and 800,000 respectively while the figures for male workers in the two sectors hardly changed. Similarly, female bankers are closing the gap with a three-fold increase in employment, making the figures for employees in finance equal in gender terms.
Some striking changes are not seen in the remaining sectors. Men were still overrepresented in contrast to women in manufacturing and public sector (non-defence) with the respective gender employment inequalities of 400,000 and 200,000 workers in both 1975 and 1995. The same goes for the public sector (defence) where there were still 200,000 more men workers than their counterparts of the opposite sex in 1995 despite the rise in the figure for women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar graphs illustrates how many men and women work in six diff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il sale in the following two decades. In 1975, 250,000 women worked in communi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, still, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32142857143 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93526021862 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3327131749 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213358546561 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878210938108 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083523570178 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14557174557 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643158174569 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.