A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that the question of whether keeping animals to meet the various demands of humans is morally justified or not remains a source of controversy. While a number of people believe that employing animals is immoral because it is necessary for them to have the same rights as humans. I would argue that exploiting animals and raising them to meet human needs is reasonable.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why people contend that it is not fair to exploit animals. That is because they are also living creatures and they have rights to live their own lives. What’s more, it is such an unfair exploitation for people to make use of some of the animals for individual purposes. To illustrate, some people raise sheep in order to make luxury suits from the leather of lambs. Besides, animals are similar to human beings, they also have their own emotions and feelings that human should take into consideration. For example, I saw on a television documentary some cows that have burst into tears when being slaughtered in the slaughterhouse.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that using animals may result in many favourable outcomes for society. Some scientists have conducted a number of researches on animal testings, especially using mice and rabbits. In terms of the medical field, some studies have succeeded in invention vaccines against diseases and cancers. Additionally, raising livestock like fishes, chickens and pigs on farms is not only a valuable source of food but it also makes a considerable contribution by boosting the income for the farmers. Another specific example of this is that many families are raising dogs as favourite pets, so that, they are both close friends to people and loyal assistants in providing security.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity. It seems to me that it is better to employ animals for reasonable purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... exploitation for people to make use of some of the animals for individual purposes. To ill...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08490566038 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92048310212 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562893081761 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9932471164 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411876817221 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120330200012 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840808602839 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22613061906 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845315818537 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.