Being outstandingly successful is the ultimate goal towards which everyone works. Some people hold the belief that in order to achieve this aim, hard work is far more indispensable than talent. However, I consider that both of them make an integral contribution to succeeding.
On the one hand, innate talent plays an original role on the way to success. Obviously, gifted people are usually quick learners who have particular abilities to be excellent in some specific fields, even without being taught. For example, the world’s history has witnessed numerous geniuses with God-given gifts such as Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Ludwig van Beethoven whose musical talents showed at an early age. All of them became great musicians in the world and have had permanent effects on following generations until now.
On the other hand, it is essential that most people must work with infinite patience to reach their targets of life. In other words, they need always put a lot of effort and care into work because regular practising is vital to enhance professional skills and broaden experiences, which leads them to their remarkable successes. By contrast, laziness is an enormous obstacle that may make humans passive, uncreative and many other negative characteristics. For instance, not all of the famous footballers in the world were born with talent in playing football, most of them have to practise hard in many hours a day to have professional skills and get high performances in this kind of sport.
In conclusion, it is no doubts that working hard and aptitude all occupy a vital part in becoming a successful person. While natural abilities are an initial basis, people are in need of hard work as well to constitute remarkable achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tive characteristics. For instance, not all of the famous footballers in the world were bo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12937062937 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80212198572 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63986013986 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0553182225 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.846153846 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192754487825 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068795998475 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644568438769 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131217154405 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570967362386 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.