High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions?
A noticeable fact is that undergraduates do not master in utilizing the money nowadays. This problem is caused by some factors, and it should be dealt with some effective solutions.
There are two primary reasons why students do not have the ability to manage money. One reason is that adolescents usually rebel and ignore parental advice. This is the age they often show to their parents that they are mature and have the responsibility for money. Another reason is the media encourages consumption by this age group. Juveniles are often lured by the endorsement of goods, this cause will directly affect the waste of money.
Feasible solutions should be produced to tackle these aforementioned problems so that students will have a better attitude. The first measure would be parents should teach children from an early age to manage money. For example, parents should not give their offsprings too much money, their children have to think how to earn and save money. Additionally, governments must control advertising aimed at this group as teenagers are easily swayed by advertisements.
In conclusion, there are some reasons why adolescents tend to waste money, and some measures could be taken to solve this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 199.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19095477387 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78420077313 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2745050631 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0833333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169319773165 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675682857846 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487927780598 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949371297526 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502498933205 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.