As housing is a basic need for people, government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Because shelter is a human fundamental need, opinions are divided on whether the government should provide accommodation for people who cannot afford one at no cost. In my opinion, one should strive by themselves to purchase a house instead of waiting for a free provision from the government.
On the one hand, it could be argued that a free provision of housing is necessary for those who cannot afford it. Advocates of this idea claim that if people didn’t even have a place to live, they could not enhance their living conditions. This is because homeless people are always considered to be uneducated, and because of the lack of shelter, their appearance is also affected badly. As a result, it is hard for them to find employment, making them continue to live that miserable life. However, I think this line of reasoning is not sound. Because homeless people don’t need to do anything to have a house, they will not appreciate it. This leads to the likelihood of them continuing with a lazy lifestyle and wasting that privilege from the government.
On the other hand, I believe free accommodation should not be provided free for the homeless people by the government because of creating unfairness in society. With the emergence of that policy, while many ordinary people must try their best, save money to buy a house, some underprivileged ones don’t need to do anything, however, they are still able to get accommodation. This unfair situation can trigger social disagreement and resentment, which later can lead to a large number of people quitting their job, an obvious decrease in the economy, and even some boycotts of the government created by the richer ones.
In conclusion, I believe the free provision of housing from the government for those who are homeless is unnecessary because not having a house can be a motivation for them to strive. Also, that policy can create some acts of aggression from the public, especially those who can afford a house.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Because shelter is a human fundamental n...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... free provision from the government. On the one hand, it could be argued that...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that privilege from the government. On the other hand, I believe free accomm...
^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...and resentment, which later can lead to a large number of people quitting their job, an obvious d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vernment created by the richer ones. In conclusion, I believe the free provis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, while, even so, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95209580838 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78753931216 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511976047904 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2034379331 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315154211639 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114819723777 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10687484536 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219560406516 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709039771273 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.