Human society has made great technological progress in the last hundred years. Some people think this also has negative effects on our life. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the development of technology have had an influence on human lives, while other people would content that such process caused adverse effects on humanity. Personally, I am for the former group because of the following reasons.
To begin with, there is no doubt that technology help to improve living standard. Firstly, thanks to the advance in technological, an increasing number of private transports such as cars, motorbike help people's live become more convenient. To be more specific, by using these method of commuting from this place to another place, people can save amount of time and goods are delivered more rapidly to customers. Secondly, cooporation between people in different countries much more easier due to the spectacular growth of Internet. Nowadays, interation by emails, phones or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings without leaving their place.
At the same time, some people believe that the progress of technology leads to negative effect on people's live. The availabilities of new communication technologes can have result in isolating people and discouraging real interaction. This view has also a root in polluted environment caused by technology development. However, it will be soon flawed because scientists are endevouring to find various green energy such as solar and wind to replace fossil fuels. In addtion, technolody applied in recycling process assist at reducing amount of rubbish thrown into the environment. Most people hope that environmental standard will be improved in the near future by innovation of technology.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguements both for against the growth of technology, but i firmly hold the view that this process offers many benefits for human.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'these methods'?
Suggestion: this method; these methods
...nvenient. To be more specific, by using these method of commuting from this place to another...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ween people in different countries much more easier due to the spectacular growth of Intern...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42181818182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95214503888 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665454545455 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0321904416 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154877963331 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522442294326 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622093712693 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856509054457 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043473820468 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.