If countries are serious about solving traffic problems, they should tax private cars very heavily and use money to provide free or very cheap rail travel.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays traffic issues become a perpetual nuisance in most of the countries. There is an existing argument that ovetaxing private cars and using that fund for providing rail transport can reduce traffic issues. I completely disagree with the statement ; because the convenience of the road transport can't be replaced by rail network and it is impossible to make railway's to remote and difficult landscapes.
Firstly, cars and road transport are the preffered mode of travel for the majority of people. No other means can provide the convenience it offers, people can use their cars at any time and go anywhere, unlike trains need to wait for the schedules.In case of emergency nobody will wat for mass transport system, thus the convenience can't be replaced. Taxing cars will make severe threat to the rights of the citizen to choose his mode of transport; instead improving roads can bring down the traffic issues.
Secondly; rail network has its own limitations; for example it cannot be made in difficult landscapes like hills and slopes. In this situations people will depend up on roads for the travel. Trains are meant for mass transport; so if there is less people to travel it will be huge waste of money to opereate a train, incontrast the cars can be best suited mode in these situations.
Overall, cars and rail transports can't be compared as these both are entirely different in the purpose it serves. Making better road's can reduce the road transportation issues, choosing rail alternative will not make a better choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e the convenience of the road transport cant be replaced by rail network and it is i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...e trains need to wait for the schedules.In case of emergency nobody will wat for m...
^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... transport system, thus the convenience cant be replaced. Taxing cars will make seve...
^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...eant for mass transport; so if there is less people to travel it will be huge waste ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oney to opereate a train, incontrast the cars can be best suited mode in these si...
^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ns. Overall, cars and rail transports cant be compared as these both are entirely ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to rail'
Suggestion: to rail
...he road transportation issues, choosing rail alternative will not make a better choi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00390625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67835457862 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58203125 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4280554782 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.454545455 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125675440619 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587765181008 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354351939059 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877104826536 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441722758195 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.