Health, education and sales are fundamental areas in development process of a country. While some people believe the help from richer countries' governments to be advantageous in enhancement of these industries, I personally disagree with the idea of assistance from wealthy countries for enhancement purposes. This essay is to provide arguments for it.
On the one hand, wealthy nations have huge finances and enormous technologies in different industries that poor countries lack. Accordingly, it is inevitable for a country to get financial and government support when it is being enhanced, since this is considered to be relevant option for it. A good example is Kazakhstan, which has been developed a lot thanks to the support from wealthy and powerful country Russia. The consequences from getting aids include much faster and more efficient way of reaching nourishment rather that self-development.
However, the common fact that everything has its costs should not be left behind, when a state is considering to get support other country's government. One of the drawbacks of such agreement is obeying and following the assisting body's rules and regulations afterwards. An example of Kazakhstan shows that nowadays its government has to follow Russia in any case, otherwise they would be obliged to repay billions of debts received from this country. Subsequently, the power of wealthy countries increases constantly, but the status of poor nations' power remain the same.
In conclusion, some reasons why I disagree with the opinion of receiving help from richer countries to enhance the country have been discussed throughout the essay. Furthermore, it is tenable to accentuate possible outcomes before requesting for help from wealthy, powerful countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51838235294 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06775201092 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6463369959 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170392620203 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633268293777 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389453038008 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110272202844 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041127975504 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.