The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
Much attention has been drawn to the extent of damage inflicted on the ecosystem by the manufacturing industry. Taking account of the enormous demand for consumer goods in the current market, I suspect the prime cause of the problem lies in the production system itself. From a personal perspective, the best course of action to solve the issue is therefore to explore alternative materials or more eco-friendly manufacturing techniques.
To bring the shortcomings of the production process into sharp focus, it is worth looking at the chemical by-products of the process. Most industrialists labour under a misapprehension that unrestrained economic growth can be achieved without damaging the environment. However, in practice, as more goods are produced, not only has more carbon dioxide been emitted to the air, but more cleaning agents have also leaked into water sources. Moreover, single-use products, most of which are non-biodegradable plastics, have been introduced to accommodate customers’ ever-increasing demands. Discarded easily and being able to remain as wastes for thousands of years, these plastic products find their way into the ocean and threaten marine fauna.
Taking those points into consideration, a plausible solution should be striving towards the usage of more environmentally friendly materials. For instance, Starbucks chains have opted for paper or bamboo straws, as well as cups, as a substitution for plastics. If the initial investment and the maintenance cost of the alternatives are high, which oftentimes are the case, governmental promotion, such as tax breaks or financial incentives can go a long way towards developing more sustainable production practices. Businesses making use of renewable sources of energy, for example, can be subsidized by taxpayers, in contrast with those that use nonrenewable sources.
In conclusion, the manufacturing sector has taken its toll on the environment due to the concomitant hazardous substances that are subsequently disposed of after the production process. In an attempt to address this issue, going green should be practised by both the companies and the governments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63496932515 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28799587256 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1986345978 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.214285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176975802685 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529313562829 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373991353418 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997001435535 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258296791756 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.