The increase in the productions of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? And what can be done to solve this problem?
A major concern which has been caused by the thriving manufacturing industry is environmental pollution. Considering the various toxic by-products, I believe the prime cause of this problem lies in the production system itself. Therefore, what the manufacturing process of businesses must undergo to solve this issue is governmental regulation.
To find the root cause of the damage done to the natural environment of the manufacturing sector, it is worth looking at the chemical substances disposed of by the producing plants. One of the gases which are emitted due to fuel consumption is carbon dioxide. Being affordable and offering financial prospects, fossil and nonrenewable sources of fuel appeal to a vast number of companies. Another hazardous substance to take into account is the pesticide which is widespread among agricultural productions. Leaking from farmland into water sources or being sprayed aerially, insecticides, as well as herbicides, contaminate human food, threaten marine fauna, and pollute the ocean. On top of that, plastics have gained much public attention due to their ability to remain as waste for thousands of years after being discarded.
Having these points in mind, the conclusion to solve the problem that I have arrived at is tougher rules and regulations enforced by the governments. If environmentally-friendly and renewable sources of energy have been invented but are not taken advantage of by producing factories, governmental promotions such as tax breaks or financial incentives will go along way towards a more sustainable economic development. One more law that can be applied is holding businesses who are doing harm to the ecosystem accountable. For instance, what the government can do is introduce stiff monetary penalties to them and require them to follow greener business practices, as in replacing plastic straws with biodegradable ones like those made of bamboo or metal.
In conclusion, it is the byproduct of the manufacturing process that takes the blame for damaging the natural environment. In an attempt to address this issue, government and businesses going green will play the key role.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47005988024 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24639408352 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637724550898 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1630231235 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227497587993 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633461045377 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05919716057 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127780860482 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618788838345 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.